While it's funny, rabble-rousing, and cage-rattling to see rival media outlets snipe at one another about who said what, it also reflects the state of accountability of media who are more concerned with agenda setting and mud slinging than journalistic accountability.
The most recent case was a hoax titled "Aristocracy Reborn," a satire piece detailing President Obama's disdain for the U.S. Constitution in his college thesis at Columbia University. Blogger Michael Leeden posted the story, thinking it was true, which inevitably landed in the hands of Rush Limbaugh. One could almost feel the unabashed hubris as the talk radio host proclaimed, "How is that hope and change working out for ya, folks?"
When it was later revealed that the thesis was bogus, Leeden was quick to retract. Limbaugh however was not only unapologetic, but defiant. "I don't care if these quotes are made up, I know Obama thinks it," said Limbaugh. "You know why Obama thinks it? Because I've heard him say it."
The proof that Limbaugh has to deliver the necessary haymaker to drop Obama and his administration to his knees showing the president as the Manchurian candidate that Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity and Fox News always thought he was has yet to be seen.
Then again maybe they're just blowing smoke. A lot of smoke.
Sex sells, and death mixed with corruption is sexy to a lot of paranoid people. It's hard to take anything Beck says seriously since he considers himself to be an entertainer and a rodeo clown, yet there are millions who take his word as gospel.
It's irresponsible for Fox or any other major media outlet to offer themselves to people as sources of information only to have a vested interest in distorting the truth. The "Most Powerful Name in News," has a credit recession considering the Bush administration gave the channel talking points to Fox commentators to promote policy. Former White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan said he didn't do this with journalists. That's because he knows journalists aren't sheep to be herded in front of cameras.
While MSNBC hasn't committed as many major faux pas as Fox, Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews can be polarizing figures from the left. With as many valid points as Olbermann has made, the "Countdown" host can do a better job of hiding his smirk while dismantling the republicans. The same can be said for Matthews.
The fact that these two channels have so much vitriol toward each other, a lot of the central points each side has gets lost in translation. It's more fun to watch an after school fight than an informative political debate. In these times where policy is going to making sweeping, wholesale, positive changes for the country, people need to be informed, not enraged.




is a member of the 



Be the first to comment on this article! Log in to Comment
You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now