Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Housewife Stereotype Remains Dominant Along with the Male

Although males feel threatened by a small number of powerful women, the female is still undermined.

Published: Wednesday, December 2, 2009

Updated: Friday, December 4, 2009 12:12

gender roles

Leonardo Alannis | Valley Star

I am female. I have deathly-pale delicate-looking skin, a "well-to-do" accent and mostly ladylike manner. For these reasons, I am under-minded, disrespected and misunderstood by many of my peers because of a stereotype and discrimination that only a female can understand. The prejudice and lack of value I experience is barely spoken about because of one reason; it is accepted.

Sexism has occurred for years. While we have made huge steps to conquer this, the current state of the male/female role in society has become a label that men use to control each of us and this begins with the engraining of norms at school. According to Cosmiclog.com, teachers call on boys in classrooms from three to eight times more frequently than they call on girls. Ironically the female population continues to overtake the males in grades and degrees at the end of college.

As males may suggest a woman's role in society has now overtaken their once-dominant ways, the statistics are unreliable at best.

Although the male death rate throughout each war is overwhelmingly higher than that of females, this is due to their own masculine "head cock" attitude – men as a whole do not believe a woman can do a "man's job," which includes fighting for our country. It is unfair to cry "conspiracy" when it is clear that men crave the power and dominance of the nation they have always held. Women are pushed down to take on jobs within the military and most other physical jobs. Men feel special by completing the stronger, more physical roles within society. This has nothing to do with female dominance; it has everything to do with the cave man takeover still engrained within many males.

"Historically and throughout my life, I have witnessed men being more dominant," said Valley College student Kent Cruz. "But it is changing at least somewhat. we need change and that's a good thing."

The statistics and opinions are available. The feminists are ready and willing to convince you of why and how we are still treated so very differently. I am neither a statistic nor a feminist. I believe in the equal rights of each person, regardless of gender boundaries and any other discrimination people choose to create such as color, social class and sexual preference. Sadly we are a nation of bullies and when an act of hate continues for too long it becomes a norm. This is what sexism has become.

Don't push me down because of your ignorance; beneath my soft spoken, ivory-washed appearance is the same muscle and bone as my male counterpart; we are all human, after all.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

3 comments Log in to Comment

human
Wed Dec 9 2009 06:07
Your name - you mention circumcision. I do not have an opinion on it either way. I can appreciate both sides of the argument - "It helps keep it clean," or "They were made they way, keep it that way." etcetera, etcetera. But if my husband and I have boys, he will make the decision if they will be circumcised or not. Many women I know will, like me, leave that decision to their husbands. When my husband makes that decision though, he will not be basing it on the belief that it will keep our son a virgin until his future wife decides, or to decrease his sexual pleasure. Nor, if the circumcision is performed, will it be performed with shards of glass, or a blunt razor blade in nonsurgical conditions. A compete opposite to ritualized female circumcision, which is designed to restrict the sexuality of a woman and keep her meek and mild, and can lead to an untold number of health problems during her lifetime.

I really wish you would not speak about females the way you do. I do not wish to see men suffer. I do not react joyfully when I hear a woman has taken a man for all he has worth in a divorce, the kids to boot. I do not smile when I hear about men dying on the front lines and think, "Yipee! Glad that wasn't a woman out there!" You are painting with very, very broad brush strokes, especially in reference to employment. Yes, equal rights for both sexes, put leave the scorn and and the sarcasm at the door. That will get us nowhere.

Your name
Tue Dec 8 2009 03:52
"I am under-minded, disrespected and misunderstood by many of my peers because of a stereotype and discrimination that only a female can understand."

Females have endured no discrimination, the likes of which males have, and still do. The authoress of this post is insane to think otherwise. Is their a draft card in her wallet? The male-only draft has caused the deaths of millions of men, and maimed countless more, as well as negatively altering the lives of every man. Because of her gender, she does not have to worry about be forced to be shot at. On the contrary, she can vote for all the war-mongering leaders she wants! It's not her hide, after all. When she was born, was she flayed alive, in that vile assault on baby boys we call "circumcision"? No, she wasn't. The government purposely discluded males, when they passed the Federal Prohibition on Genital Mutilation Act. She is intact; but, she can mutilate her male offspring, for any reason, with complete impunity. Males die from the 10 leading causes of death in the greatest numbers; but, there exists no offices for their health, like there are for women, at the federal, state, county and municipality levels. None! But, who cares if men die, after all. Our country doesn't. On the contrary, it gives women impunity to kill and hurt men, by claiming that only men are domestic abusers; and, denying males into public abuse shelters. Is there any public ground on which the authoress can not walk on, because of her gender? Similarly to the lack of men's health offices, there exists no men's resource centers on our schools, even though women are the vast majority of college students. But, who cares about men's educations any more than their lives? Our country certainly does not! That's why it offers female-only scholarships and grants; but, not any grants or scholarships for men. When the authoress applies for a job, will she not get it; because, society has deemed it 'positive' to discriminate against them, and enacted something called 'affirmative action', which mandates gender quotas on hiring for her gender? No, she will get that job, over a male; because of her gender! But, who care if men are discriminated against and denied employment and promotions; because, of their gender? Our society doesn't, that's why we mandate that female applicants get priority.

I could go for forever; but, I have mentioned enough of the authoress's female privileges for one day. It's time for a men's movement gents! It's time we win our rights! No more shall we be relegated as second class citizens, by female supremacists and misandrists, who wish to see us suffer. Equal rights for men!

If anyone wants to get in touch with me, my email is menareangrynow@gmail.com.

Ciao for now my brothers, my heart is with you.

Marc A
Fri Dec 4 2009 21:52
This article is all about anti-male stereotypes. The truth is that most men would quit their jobs or lower their pay if their partner could support the family, according to a CNN report at www . cnn.com/2007/US/Careers/06/13/dads.work/index.html

The real problem is not ment, but maternal gatekeeping by women who insist on being primary parents. See, New York Times, 11/3/08, "Fathers Gain Respect From Experts (and Mothers)" nytimes.com/2009/11/03/health/03dads.html

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In